STUDIES
THE ROLE OF THE PORTUGUESE SCIENTIFIC POLICE
IN THE JUDICIAL SYSTEM (PART II)
Francisco Teodósio Jacinto
Deputy General Attorney
Former Director of the High Institute of the
Polícia Judiciária and of Criminal Sciences
VII. The recruitment and training of the staff of the Polícia Judiciária (Portuguese Scientific Police). VIII. Cooperation with the Official Portuguese Language African Countries and with Brazil. IX. Police cooperation within the European Union. X. International police cooperation – the INTERPOL
DRUG POLICIES, DEMOCRACY AND HUMAN RIGHTS IN BRAZIL
Rubens R. R. Casara
Judge at the Court of the state of Rio de Janeiro
This article analyses the criminal policy on the combat of drug traffic and consumption in Brazil, particularly the Law 11343/2006.
APTITUDE DOCUMENTS AND QUALIFICATION DOCUMENTS IN THE
PROCEDURES IN VIEW OF A PUBLIC CONTRACT
Marco Real Martins
Lawyer
Miguel Assis Raimundo
Lawyer.
Law School of the University of Lisbon
Abstract: 1. Introduction and problem statement 2. The separation between the procedural phases of qualification, proposal evaluation and aptitude evaluation 2.1. Analysis of the proponent and evaluation of the proposal: grounds for a separation 2.2. Distinction between qualifications and aptitude – searching for an operative criterion 3. Distinction between aptitude (documents) and (documents concerning the) qualification: the adopted position 4. A test to the criterion: the requirement for certification of quality or environmental standards.
Justice secrecy: the little box of secrets or secrets on the loose?
Vera Lúcia Raposo
Law School of the University of
Coimbra
Lawyer
1. Justice secrecy. 2. Justice secrecy and the media. 3. The
breach of justice secrecy crime; 3.1. The case Campos
Dâmaso vs. Portugal. 4. The conflict of interests; 4.1.
The right to inform and the right to the information;
4.1.1. The right to inform; 4.1.1.1. The legitimate inter-
est of journalists; 4.1.2. The right to the information;
4.2. The right to privacy; 4.2.1. Special rules of privacy
protection; 4.2.2. Wiretapping; 4.2.3. The presumption
of innocence; 4.3. The achievement of justice.
Non-homogeneous judicial criteria for the conversion
under article 16 of the Experimental Civil Procedure’s
Rules
287
ABSTRACTS / RESUMES
288
ABSTRACTS / RESUMES
Rui Pinto
Law School of the University of Lisbon
ABSTRACT: § 1º Framework. 1. The Experimental Civil
Procedure’s Rules. 2. The article 16 of the Experimental
Civil Procedure’s Rules: statement and issue. § 2º Pre-
liminary position. 1. Doctrine. 2. Non-homogeneous con-
version of the interim injunction into the main process. ?
A. Object and conditions; ? B. Non-conditions; ? C.
Procedure. 3. Conclusions. Unresolved problem: the
judicial criteria for the conversion of the object of the
process. § 3º Interim object and final object. 1. Qualifica-
tion of the conversion under article 16 of the Experimen-
tal Civil Procedure’s Rules as a form of anticipatory
protection. 2. The anticipatory object; conclusions. 3.
The interim object. ? A. Some doctrinal notes; ? B. Per-
sonal position; ? C. Non-identity with the final object; ?
D. The paradoxical use of the interim object. § 4º Return
to article 16 of the Experimental Civil Procedure’s Rules.
1. Criteria of conversion under article 16. ? A. Conver-
sion of the cause of action; ? B. Conversion of the antici-
patory request; ? C. Conversion of the security request §
5º Conclusions.
RESUMES
LE RÔLE DE LA POLICE JUDICIAIRE DANS LE SYS-
TEME JUDICIAIRE (2 ème Parte)
Francisco Teodósio Jacinto
Procureur général adjoint